Tryton - Issues

 

Issue7736

Title Trunk based docker images
Priority feature Status testing
Superseder Nosy List ced, pokoli, reviewbot
Type feature request Components Docker
Assigned To pokoli Keywords review
Reviews 74361002
View: 74361002

Created on 2018-09-25.14:08:18 by pokoli, last changed by ced.

Messages
msg45181 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-12-07.00:09:17
For the record, I think if such image is created it should follow https://discuss.tryton.org/t/docker-image-for-developers/458 instead of being just a copy of existing images.
msg44782 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-11-06.19:47:57
As I do not want to spend my time on this. I think anyone is free to show that he can manage such development image by publishing it. Once he shows dedication on this tasks, we can consider include it in standard.
msg44779 (view) Author: [hidden] (pokoli) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-11-06.18:52:15
On 25/9/18 15:26, C├ędric Krier wrote:
> - docker does not provide a way to define an image as development only
I don't see any problem, just tag the image as development and do not mark them with the latest label. It won't be downloaded unless told explicity

> - it requires to follow on day to day the dependencies of the development
Then we can know in advance which dependencies may break the future release, which sound good for me. 

> - we do not guarantee migration on development version
That's exactly the same when running from source code or installing the development packages from sources.

> - what happens during the transition between two series?
Not sure to understand which issue you see here. For me there is no issue between the transition, as the image is freezed (like the repository) and it can be used to test the future release.
review74361002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/74361002/#ps20001
msg44124 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-09-25.15:26:42
I'm not very fan of this for four reasons:

- docker does not provide a way to define an image as development only
- it requires to follow on day to day the dependencies of the development
- we do not guarantee migration on development version
- what happens during the transition between two series?
review74361002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/74361002/#ps1
msg44121 (view) Author: [hidden] (pokoli) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-09-25.14:08:17
I think it will be good to add a docker image for trunk as this will allow non technical users to run the latest version and test new features. 

Also this image can be used to develop custom modules on trunk version.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-12-07 00:09:17cedsetmessages: + msg45181
2018-11-06 19:47:57cedsetmessages: + msg44782
2018-11-06 18:52:16pokolisetmessages: + msg44779
2018-09-25 16:52:06reviewbotsetmessages: + msg44125
2018-09-25 15:26:42cedsetnosy: + ced
messages: + msg44124
2018-09-25 14:33:06reviewbotsetnosy: + reviewbot
messages: + msg44123
2018-09-25 14:09:21pokolisetstatus: in-progress -> testing
reviews: 74361002
keyword: + review
2018-09-25 14:08:18pokolicreate

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)