Tryton - Issues

 

Issue7556

Title More party name on address
Priority feature Status resolved
Superseder Nosy List Timitos, ced, reviewbot, roundup-bot
Type feature request Components party, stock, stock_package_shipping_dpd, stock_package_shipping_ups
Assigned To ced Keywords review
Reviews 58321002, 54271002, 62301002
View: 58321002, 54271002, 62301002

Created on 2018-07-02.17:42:54 by ced, last changed by roundup-bot.

Messages
New changeset fd816ea0b21d by Cédric Krier in branch 'default':
Add party_name and attention party on address
https://hg.tryton.org/tryton-env/rev/fd816ea0b21d
New changeset 8a6f946e5766 by Cédric Krier in branch 'default':
Use party name of the address as name
https://hg.tryton.org/modules/stock_package_shipping_ups/rev/8a6f946e5766
New changeset d825329bbb8f by Cédric Krier in branch 'default':
Use party full name
https://hg.tryton.org/modules/stock_package_shipping_dpd/rev/d825329bbb8f
New changeset 95adff06ae10 by Cédric Krier in branch 'default':
Add party_name and attention party on address
https://hg.tryton.org/modules/party/rev/95adff06ae10
review58321002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/58321002/#ps40001
review54271002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/54271002/#ps20001
review62301002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/62301002/#ps100001
review58321002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/58321002/#ps20001
review62301002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/62301002/#ps80001
review62301002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/62301002/#ps60001
review62301002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/62301002/#ps40001
New review62301002 at https://codereview.tryton.org/62301002/#ps20001
New review54271002 at https://codereview.tryton.org/54271002/#ps1
New review58321002 at https://codereview.tryton.org/58321002/#ps1
msg42017 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-07-02.17:42:54
For now, the party name used to format addresses is the full name of the party linked to it. And we support to deliver to another party on the sale.
But sometimes, we need to use for a party an address which is not his but we do not want (or cannot) create a new party for it. The typical example is addresses filled by the customer on a e-shop. So I propose to add an optional field 'party_name' on the address which will be used instead of party.full_name if filled.
Also when the party of the document is different of the party linked to the address, this other party name should be displayed as "Attention Name". This field should be available on the address format.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-08-21 19:02:16roundup-botsetmessages: + msg43022
2018-08-21 19:02:13roundup-botsetmessages: + msg43021
2018-08-21 19:02:07roundup-botsetmessages: + msg43020
2018-08-21 19:02:03roundup-botsetstatus: testing -> resolved
nosy: + roundup-bot
messages: + msg43019
2018-07-20 20:38:29reviewbotsetmessages: + msg42226
2018-07-20 20:38:27reviewbotsetmessages: + msg42225
2018-07-20 20:38:22reviewbotsetmessages: + msg42224
2018-07-03 16:10:21reviewbotsetmessages: + msg42051
2018-07-03 12:19:05reviewbotsetmessages: + msg42036
2018-07-03 11:13:02reviewbotsetmessages: + msg42034

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)