Tryton - Issues

 

Issue7438

Title General ledger for party required
Priority feature Status chatting
Superseder Nosy List ced, josesalvador, pokoli
Type feature request Components account
Assigned To Keywords
Reviews

Created on 2018-05-17.12:22:55 by ced, last changed by josesalvador.

Messages
msg42073 (view) Author: [hidden] (josesalvador) Date: 2018-07-05.20:00:10
Hi,

I'm very noob with tryton. Anyway I'm trying to contribute to this issue with this effort, in fact id my very first approach to tryton :-) :

https://bitbucket.org/numenalia/account/commits/7b4b43b8754e117933e481aab489b3b668f02cb0

It's only a draft, not completed, but I have had to stop 'cause I don't find the way to show a nested tree with distinct columns of its parent.

Is it possible??
msg40735 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-05-17.18:00:05
On 2018-05-17 17:20, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
> > For me, this does not fulfill the requirement. We want to see the sub-account for each party with the debit/credit and balance.
> 
> Let me clarify: I agree with the requirement and with the pruposal. Just thought that may be a good addition to allow a check to enable or disable the "one row per party who has entries" like we do for party cumulate on general ledger lines.

For me, they should be children of of the account so they can be
expanded or not.
msg40734 (view) Author: [hidden] (pokoli) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-05-17.17:20:20
> For me, this does not fulfill the requirement. We want to see the sub-account for each party with the debit/credit and balance.

Let me clarify: I agree with the requirement and with the pruposal. Just thought that may be a good addition to allow a check to enable or disable the "one row per party who has entries" like we do for party cumulate on general ledger lines.
msg40732 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-05-17.17:02:54
For me, this does not fulfill the requirement. We want to see the sub-account for each party with the debit/credit and balance.
msg40725 (view) Author: [hidden] (pokoli) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-05-17.16:37:13
I'm wondering if we should not add a check on the context (which can be marked as default) to allow the user to compute the value per party or to see the sum of the account when the value is unchecked.
msg40716 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-05-17.12:22:55
For the accounts with party required, as we manage them as sub-account, we should display in the general ledger as children. It should be one row per party who has entries.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-07-05 20:00:10josesalvadorsetnosy: + josesalvador
messages: + msg42073
2018-05-17 18:00:05cedsetmessages: + msg40735
2018-05-17 17:20:20pokolisetmessages: + msg40734
2018-05-17 17:02:54cedsetmessages: + msg40732
2018-05-17 16:37:13pokolisetstatus: unread -> chatting
nosy: + pokoli
messages: + msg40725
2018-05-17 12:22:55cedcreate

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)