Tryton - Issues



Title Stock Consignment
Priority feature Status resolved
Superseder Nosy List ced, prakashpp, reviewbot, roundup-bot
Type feature request Components account_tax_rule_country, purchase, stock
Assigned To ced Keywords review
Reviews 38321003,32241002,36321002,37411002
View: 38321003, 32241002, 36321002, 37411002

Created on 2017-04-11.22:56:06 by ced, last changed by roundup-bot.

New changeset 28f2b03b2b26 by Cédric Krier in branch 'default':
Add support for stock_consigment
New changeset 8328d2bea1e4 by Cédric Krier in branch 'default':
Initial commit
New changeset aa4e6cd1a6cc by Cédric Krier in branch 'default':
Require move assignation also on view location

New changeset 5e47d6149ac0 by Cédric Krier in branch 'default':
Do not need origin if both types matches

New changeset ca4387c7769f by Cédric Krier in branch 'default':
Require unit price from supplier only to storage

New changeset 84d9ad2dc240 by Cédric Krier in branch 'default':
Assign only move that requires assignation
New changeset 65cebbef167d by Cédric Krier in branch 'default':
Make supplier fields are not visible for supplier to supplier moves
review38321003 updated at
review37411002 updated at
msg33715 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2017-05-19.15:28:01
Here is review37411002 for account_tax_rule_country as discussed in
review38321003 updated at
msg33533 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2017-05-03.16:27:18
@prakashpp I continue the discussion [1] about using supplier location in customer shipment. I have updated the module to create origin for inventory moves of shipment out and shipment out return.

msg33454 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2017-04-27.10:18:35
It seems that we should also set the invoice line origin on inventory move of the customer shipment.
review38321003 updated at
review36321002 updated at
msg33203 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2017-04-11.23:04:14
The review32241002 could maybe be split as it combine different unique modifications.
New review38321003 at
msg33201 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2017-04-11.22:56:05
Implementation of
Date User Action Args
2017-06-24 10:44:47roundup-botsetmessages: + msg34204
2017-06-24 10:40:55roundup-botsetmessages: + msg34203
2017-06-24 10:34:31roundup-botsetmessages: + msg34202
2017-06-24 10:27:34roundup-botsetstatus: testing -> resolved
nosy: + roundup-bot
messages: + msg34201
2017-05-22 18:09:47reviewbotsetmessages: + msg33738
2017-05-19 15:40:43reviewbotsetmessages: + msg33716
2017-05-19 15:28:02cedsetreviews: 38321003,32241002,36321002 -> 38321003,32241002,36321002,37411002
component: + account_tax_rule_country
messages: + msg33715
2017-05-03 16:31:40reviewbotsetmessages: + msg33534
2017-05-03 16:27:18cedsetstatus: in-progress -> testing
nosy: + prakashpp
messages: + msg33533
2017-04-27 10:18:35cedsetstatus: testing -> in-progress
messages: + msg33454

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)