Tryton - Issues



Title reversal/extourne moves
Priority feature Status chatting
Superseder Nosy List Timitos, ced, risto3, yangoon
Type feature request Components
Assigned To Keywords

Created on 2015-12-14.14:22:44 by risto3, last changed by Timitos.

msg39883 (view) Author: [hidden] (risto3) Date: 2018-04-08.12:28:30
do you have a 'guest' account for g$ggle that can be used with rietveld?
msg39882 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-04-08.12:26:36
So do not expect any quick reviews from the developers if you do not follow the workflow but just throw patches like that.
msg39881 (view) Author: [hidden] (risto3) Date: 2018-04-08.12:15:12
?! This is not something to 'replace' rietveld... 

It is simply a means to communicate the patches proposed in order to not waste time because there are many (including myself) who don't (and won't) have a g$ggle account.

If you wish, I can append the patchsets to this message (which seems superfluous given they are directly available in bitbucket)
msg39880 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-04-08.12:04:44
This method does not allow to perform a review which is all the point of rietveld.
msg39879 (view) Author: [hidden] (risto3) Date: 2018-04-08.11:49:10
you can also inspect the raw commits by going to commits, selecting a commit (for example  'initial allow_negative_moves commit') then clicking 'view raw commits'
here, there are two commits presented at the moment.
msg39878 (view) Author: [hidden] (risto3) Date: 2018-04-08.11:36:22
No account necessary, just hg clone
I used bitbucket and mercurial in order to avoid comments about git (on github).

As to issue2178, let's keep the discussion there.
msg39877 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-04-08.11:30:09
As far as I can tell a bitbucket account is required to review your patch.
And I have seen no contribution from you to issue2178.
msg39875 (view) Author: [hidden] (risto3) Date: 2018-04-08.11:28:15
From what I can tell, a g$ggle account is still necessary, therefore not possible.
(this still needs to change)
msg39874 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2018-04-08.11:25:13
Please follow:
msg39872 (view) Author: [hidden] (risto3) Date: 2018-04-08.09:07:22
As a first phase, I propose using a configuration parameter permitting the possibility for negative move lines and policing the policy at post time:
I include an updated scenario_move_cancel.rst

This provides a simple manner for a national account plan to explicitly for the setting of this parameter and eventually disabling the ability to change it.

As as second phase, to enhance the date chosen if the period is closed to the first day in a subsequent 'open' period instead of as it is now.

Finally, to better support automation of accrual moves and their 'extourne' (or storno), add an 'extourne' wizard and a field on the move indicating the need to do so.

I guess I should reiterate the fact that Tryton currently permitting negative move lines to be posted is contrary to French reglementation, therefore it is still somewhat urgent to implement this (or something similar) in base.
msg23352 (view) Author: [hidden] (risto3) Date: 2015-12-14.16:06:11
msg23351 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2015-12-14.15:56:02
And can you give http links.
msg23350 (view) Author: [hidden] (risto3) Date: 2015-12-14.15:44:15
msg23349 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2015-12-14.15:09:41
I don't understand what is requested.
Please give the link to the discussion.
msg23348 (view) Author: [hidden] (risto3) Date: 2015-12-14.14:22:42
This is a placeholder for the reversal wizard as discussed on the forum.

In some countries, such as France, cancellation of a validated entry
may only be done by a reversal entry.

In addition, 'extourne' or 'storno' moves for adjusting entries use a
similar (even same) mechanism, but forcibly in a future period, 
typically the first day in the next fiscal year.

It should be possible to disactivate cancellation in favour of reversal
as a policy, potentially even enforced (e.g. in account_fr)
Date User Action Args
2018-05-11 22:39:07Timitossetnosy: + Timitos
2018-04-08 19:27:11yangoonsetnosy: + yangoon
2018-04-08 12:28:30risto3setmessages: + msg39883
2018-04-08 12:26:37cedsetmessages: + msg39882
2018-04-08 12:15:12risto3setmessages: + msg39881
2018-04-08 12:04:45cedsetmessages: + msg39880
2018-04-08 11:49:10risto3setmessages: + msg39879
2018-04-08 11:36:22risto3setmessages: + msg39878
2018-04-08 11:30:09cedsetmessages: + msg39877
2018-04-08 11:28:15risto3setmessages: + msg39875

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)