Tryton - Issues

 

Issue5169

Title general ledger options
Priority feature Status chatting
Superseder Nosy List Timitos, ced, risto3
Type Components
Assigned To Keywords
Reviews

Created on 2015-12-04.08:46:21 by risto3, last changed by Timitos.

Messages
msg23305 (view) Author: [hidden] (risto3) Date: 2015-12-04.10:08:23
As part of revision/control/audit, and subsequently for archival, 
it is usage in France (at least for many/most certified accountants and auditors) to have complete general ledgers (reconciled and non-reconciled entries) as well as only non-reconciled entries (which is hugely collapsed as hundreds (even thousands) of reconciled move lines are eliminated.

It is absolutely not a question of balance as that gives no detail.
msg23304 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2015-12-04.09:58:33
This makes no sense for me for the general ledger.
Also I think you are just looking for the third party balance.
msg23302 (view) Author: [hidden] (risto3) Date: 2015-12-04.08:46:20
There should to be an option to output only unreconciled entries in the general ledger, which upon closing the fiscal year will be primarily for the non-reconciled accounts payables/receivables deferred to N+1, although not limited to these.

Also, it would be useful to have as well a report of the auxiliary general ledger which could output either or both clients and suppliers or all third parties.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-05-11 23:22:54Timitossetnosy: + Timitos
2018-04-16 18:26:46cedlinkissue7360 superseder
2016-02-15 23:18:49cedsetstatus: testing -> chatting
2015-12-04 10:08:23risto3setmessages: + msg23305
2015-12-04 09:58:34cedsetstatus: unread -> testing
nosy: + ced
messages: + msg23304
2015-12-04 08:46:21risto3create

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)