Improve customisation of ir.sequence

I see most businesses using short-year sequences on invoices like "1424121505"

assigned to @hiaselhans

added type::feature + 1 deleted label

For me, it doesn't look like a good addition for 2 reasons:

- using year of sequence in invoice sequence is wrong because it is not the accounting date. The right solution is to hardcode the year in the sequence template.
- it doesn't improve the current code.

Instead the code should be improved to allow customization of the parameters by third modules.

added 1 deleted label and removed 1 deleted label

Change the issue for just customisation.

unassigned @hiaselhans

added easy trytond labels

allow for a short_year substitution in sequences

Please don't re-add patches that were not accepted because a better solution is preferred.

what do you mean?
No notification when a review is unassigned?
"""
Instead the code should be improved to allow customization of the parameters by third modules.
"""
Is what is happening in the quoted review.

"""
Change the issue for just customisation.
"""
is what i did, you changed the title back to "improve..."

Please, follow your own conventions at least..

And could I know that you changed your review ? It is still wrongly named.

assigned to @hiaselhans

added 1 deleted label and removed 1 deleted label

I expected the review system to handle this for me. My fault...

what's the proper title you have in mind?

I added review24241002 which allows extension on third party modules.

assigned to @pokoli and unassigned @hiaselhans

added 1 deleted label and removed 1 deleted label

New changeset d4c31394f786 by Sergi Almacellas Abellana in branch 'default':
Allow to customize the substitutions used on sequence
http://hg.tryton.org/trytond/rev/d4c31394f786

added 1 deleted label and removed 1 deleted label

closed