Created on 2021-10-08.15:20:36 by pokoli, last changed 3 months ago by ced.
I think it is not necessary to have this behavior in proteus. But if you can implement it easily, you are welcomed.
For the tax, please fill another issue because we need to pur a unique constraint.
Why not? I can not add twice the same record in tryton so proteus should behave the same.
Also, if you open such record from the gtk client only one tax is shown (you should dig into the database to realize that there are two taxes). So there is a incoherence between clients there.
In my scenario my main problem is that the user did not notice that the tax is already there.
For me it is not a bug as you add a second tax. And I'm not sure we want to support the uniqueness of Many2Many in proteus.
Steps to reproduce:
|2021-10-08 15:39:07||ced||set||messages: + msg70771|
|2021-10-08 15:36:00||pokoli||set||messages: + msg70768|
nosy: + ced
priority: bug -> feature
status: unread -> chatting
Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)