Message 73962

Author
nicoe
Date
2022-02-08.18:32:54
Message id
73962

Content

* Cédric Krier  [2022-02-08 18:01 +0100]: 
>
>Cédric Krier <cedric.krier@b2ck.com> added the comment:
>
>On 2022-02-08 17:51, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
>> >But if it is removed then the xxx2Many will be loaded even for affix.
>>
>> I don't understand, you mean an affix column put on a x2M? I don't think it
>> makes sens to use a x2M column for an affix.
>
>I mean that the xxx2many's records will be loaded when the widget is not
>visible and the tree view has an affix. And we do not want that.

OK I understand.

But I think we need to find a better solution to the issue that the realized
decorator tries to solve. Because I don't think its reasoning fits the GTk
design choices, thus I'm pretty sure sooner or later the get_realized call will
be removed (juste like they removed is_visible).
History
Date User Action Args
2022-02-08 18:32:55nicoesetrecipients: + ced
2022-02-08 18:32:55nicoelinkissue11228 messages
2022-02-08 18:32:54nicoecreate

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)