Message 64853

Message id


On 2021-02-25 10:45, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
> El 25/2/21 a les 10:31, C├ędric Krier ha escrit:
> >> No, backorder is not planned at the original delivery date. It's unplanned and this is wrong.
> > It is because you receive today.
> Of course, because I receive part of the goods today and I will expect the latter to be in the future. 
> A partial delivery before the planned_date does not invalidate the I will receive the other products in the future. 

I think it creates enough uncertainty that the safer is to not guess.

> Receiving the move in the past have the same behaviour.
> Receiving the move in the future makes the new move to be scheduled to the same date as I used despite being before the planned_delivery date.

OK so you would like that instead of the delivery date computed, it will
use a kind of "planned delivery date" without taking into account the
stock moves.
Maybe it is a risk that can be taken because I guess if the backorder is
no more at the planned date, the user will be warned and he will edit
Date User Action Args
2021-02-25 11:26:03cedsetrecipients: + pokoli
2021-02-25 11:26:03cedlinkissue10126 messages
2021-02-25 11:26:03cedcreate

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)