Tryton - Issues

 

Message57978

Author albertca
Recipients ced, reviewbot
Date 2020-05-12.18:51:01
Content
Missatge de Cédric Krier <bugs@tryton.org> del dia dt., 12 de maig 2020 a
les 17:09:

>
> Cédric Krier <cedric.krier@b2ck.com> added the comment:
>
> On 2020-05-12 16:59, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > The proposal is an improvement because at least prevents corrupting data
> but at the same time what is the purpose of considering both configuration
> file and ir.configuration settings?
>
> By design the field definition can not depend on a setting in the
> database because the field define the database schema.
> And for performance, we cannot read in the database each time we need
> this value. It would be too expensive and slow. And using a Function
> field would add a lot of code on many models for no benefit (as any way
> the UI user can not modify it).
>

Understood.

>
> ______________________________________
> Tryton issue tracker <bugs@tryton.org>
> <https://bugs.tryton.org/issue9324>
> ______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2020-05-12 18:51:01albertcasetrecipients: + ced
2020-05-12 18:51:01albertcalinkissue9324 messages
2020-05-12 18:51:01albertcacreate

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)