>> It does need to permit the suppliers code to be entered, though, >> as that is by far the typical case. The "Product" field supports that now. > Fixed in last patchset. much better, but it could add the missing code in the drop down list as: "[<supplier's code>] supplier's name >> BTW, the field should probably be called "Supplier's Product" >> instead of "Product Suppliers" (which implies a list of suppliers) > There is no ending "s". well, IMHO: 'Product' is a *noun* as indication for what is searched for the in first field in 'Product Supplier', the noun is now 'supplier' for the second, which is unintuitive and rather confusing. Therefore, by using 'Supplier's Product', the noun remains 'Product'. >> Thinking ahead, is it possible to enhance the searcher on the Supplier's >> product field? For things like attributes/variants, manufacturers, and what not. > Searching on Dict field is another topic: issue4710 cool, that should do!
|2017-10-06 19:20:47||risto3||set||messageid: <email@example.com>|
|2017-10-06 19:20:47||risto3||set||recipients: + ced, resteve, jesteve, kstenger, bvo, reviewbot, nblock|
|2017-10-06 19:20:47||risto3||link||issue3797 messages|
Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)