Message 36113

Message id


gave this a try... not so bad.
it's still seems weird to need an additional field.

It does need to permit the suppliers code to be entered, though,
as that is by far the typical case. The "Product" field supports that now.

BTW, the field should probably be called "Supplier's Product"
instead of "Product Suppliers" (which implies a list of suppliers)

Thinking ahead, is it possible to enhance the searcher on the Supplier's
product field? For things like attributes/variants, manufacturers, and what not.
(yes, I remember being told that currently the product/variant/supplier relations are foobar, but we hope to rapidly address that for our needs
as there can be a better way to manage ~18K articles)
Date User Action Args
2017-10-06 17:34:52risto3setmessageid: <>
2017-10-06 17:34:52risto3setrecipients: + ced, resteve, jesteve, kstenger, bvo, reviewbot, nblock
2017-10-06 17:34:52risto3linkissue3797 messages
2017-10-06 17:34:52risto3create

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)