I'm sort of lost on parts of this discussion. Part A (tax bases only) categorises the tax bases in Part B (where the tax code will finally indicate the tax due by tax rate). The total of the exVAT bases in Part A is equal to the sum of the exVAT base by tax rate in Part B. It is quite inexact to simplify saying, for example, that line 01 (code 0979) in Part A is equal to the sum of any lines in Part B. In fact, the operations in Part B need to simply specify their Part B tax code base and tax code, as well as the Part A categorie such as sales revenue (0979), other imposable operations (0981) et cetera. Take an example of a subcontractor with 'autoliquidation' for 10K€ @20%VAT: Part A Line 02: 10.000 Part B base : due tax Line 08: 10.000 : 2.000 deductible TVA Line 20: 2.000 This was seemingly easy to configure in the taxes by adding a tax 'TVA Achat de services Taux Normal (autoliquidation)' with a child 'TVA Achat de services Taux 20% (autoliquidation)' which has itself two children: 'TVA Achat de services Taux 20% (1)' having base code: 0981 tax code: 0702 'TVA Achat de services Taux 20% (2)' having base code: 0207 tax code: 0207 tax sign inverted but doing this, I realised there is not only the lack of cash-basis support where I found a discussion topic to elaborate further, but also thorny issues on the credit note side. Unfortunately, as I mentioned there, there are complications not very easily dealt with so I tend to side with Cédric that tax reporting is not providing satisfactory results and, further, I believe it should be able to disactivate it, at least for now, on a company basis.. Thus leaving only the accounting moves for manual processing.
|2017-09-30 23:38:03||risto3||set||messageid: <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|2017-09-30 23:38:03||risto3||set||recipients: + ced, rhertzog, reviewbot|
|2017-09-30 23:38:03||risto3||link||issue6404 messages|
Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)