El 22/09/16 a les 10:15, Cédric Krier ha escrit: > On 2016-09-22 09:49, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: >>> > > Cédric Krier <firstname.lastname@example.org> added the comment: >>> > > >>> > > I'm wondering if it should not be a logging feature instead of changing the error message because it is for debugging purpose. >> > >> > Maybe we should add both options, > For me, it is wrong to show ID to the end user. I must admit that i'm not very convinced with the current proposal which includes the ID in the message as sometimes it wont be usufull for the user. Two examples: 1. Fields inside One2Many as id is normally hiden. 2. When failing record is a newly created record (already explained in the thread) > >> > but in which log level are you thinking? Because for me using DEBUG should be so much intrusive. > Maybe INFO because this is normally something that should never happen > except if there is a bug or forged requests so it will not be too verbose. Ok, so lets add it as INFO logging and forget about adding the ID in the error message.
|2016-09-23 14:51:58||pokoli||set||messageid: <email@example.com>|
|2016-09-23 14:51:58||pokoli||set||recipients: + ced, resteve, guillemNaN, reviewbot|
|2016-09-23 14:51:58||pokoli||link||issue5581 messages|
Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)