Message 26092

Message id


On 2016-06-03 14:17, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
> El 03/06/16 a les 14:05, C├ędric Krier ha escrit:
> > On 2016-06-03 13:50, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
> >> >Showing the ID will be a great improvement but for me the rec_name is more clear for the end user. So maybe we can add both values, so in case the user can not find the record by the rec_name (it have changed) it can use the id.
> > I have explained previously that rec_name can not be used on invalid record.
> And ID can not be used on new created records as the transaction will be 
> rolled back.

It can be used but of course after the transaction it will no longer be
present. But nothing can be done against that.
Date User Action Args
2016-06-03 15:00:13cedsetrecipients: + resteve, pokoli, guillemNaN
2016-06-03 15:00:13cedlinkissue5581 messages
2016-06-03 15:00:13cedcreate

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)