Message 26092

Author
ced
Date
2016-06-03.15:00:13
Message id
26092

Content

On 2016-06-03 14:17, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
> El 03/06/16 a les 14:05, C├ędric Krier ha escrit:
> > On 2016-06-03 13:50, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
> >> >Showing the ID will be a great improvement but for me the rec_name is more clear for the end user. So maybe we can add both values, so in case the user can not find the record by the rec_name (it have changed) it can use the id.
> > I have explained previously that rec_name can not be used on invalid record.
> And ID can not be used on new created records as the transaction will be 
> rolled back.

It can be used but of course after the transaction it will no longer be
present. But nothing can be done against that.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-03 15:00:13cedsetrecipients: + resteve, pokoli, guillemNaN
2016-06-03 15:00:13cedlinkissue5581 messages
2016-06-03 15:00:13cedcreate

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)