Created on 2021-01-10.23:59:07 by ced, last changed 6 days ago by yangoon.
Ping. Any comment on this?
I think that the ssl configuration is even more obscured by this change. This feature deserves without doubt a dedicated setting. When the change is backported it is nevertheless an API breakage. So I don't see the difference between the proposed change and the introduction of a new dedicated and meaningful setting.
A common issue is that when the SSL is delegated to a proxy server, the URL built without a requests are considered as non secure. This is because we rely on the presence of a certificate/privatekey in the configuration.
This can be seen in the email sent when the admin password is reset via command line.
I propose to allow to set only one of the two configuration keys so the internal web server will not try to setup SSL and make
This proposal has minor impact and so it can be back-ported without too much pain.
|2021-01-15 11:29:45||yangoon||set||messages: + msg63883|
|2021-01-11 09:53:08||pokoli||set||nosy: + pokoli|
nosy: + yangoon
nosy: + reviewbot
+ backport, review|
status: in-progress -> testing
Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)