Created on 2020-05-06.00:14:26 by ced, last changed 6 months ago by ced.
The party that is replaced on the invoice may not have been created before the numbered_at. So accessing it will raise an access error about record does not exist. See https://discuss.tryton.org/t/after-a-duplicate-party-is-deleted-i-get-you-try-to-read-records-that-dont-exist-anymore-document-type-party-party/2544 A possible solution would be to change the numbered_at but we will lose information. Another option would be to *hack* the party read to use the replaced record.
Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)