Tryton - Issues

 

Issue6335

Title Allow lost_found as output of production
Priority feature Status testing
Superseder Nosy List ced, edbo, pokoli, reviewbot
Type feature request Components production
Assigned To pokoli Keywords review
Reviews 323431002
View: 323431002

Created on 2017-03-07.13:41:34 by ced, last changed by reviewbot.

Messages
review323431002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/323431002/#ps303891002
review323431002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/323431002/#ps294071002
review323431002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/323431002/#ps321601002
msg58435 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2020-06-03.09:53:52
I'm wondering if we should not define the lost_found locations that can be used per production location. This is to make echo with issue9071.
msg58429 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2020-06-02.23:40:34
If the "waste" is valuable then it is not a waste but a product that you move in the proper location like any other parts produced.
msg58425 (view) Author: [hidden] (edbo) Date: 2020-06-02.20:34:00
Production is not always assembling parts, but most of the time it's crafting things (with hand tools to CNC-machines). For example, a metal workshop is producing parts by CNC milling raw blocks of titanium. The raw block ways 1kg and after milling only 300 grams are left which is the actual product. So 700 grams are "waste". However this "waste" can be sold to a recycling company who melts the "waste" to create a new raw block.

The same for a wood workshop. They can sell the waste so other companies can do things with it. Other times the waste have to be treated as chemical waste, so extra care has to be taken.

In short, this waste is valuable waste and can be sold. I think in such cases you want to create a location with type "waste" or something.
review323431002 updated at https://codereview.tryton.org/323431002/#ps317541002
msg32562 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2017-03-17.00:29:09
I think we need more feedback on this topic.
msg32530 (view) Author: [hidden] (pokoli) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2017-03-16.10:40:59
> When I saw that product going to lost_found are excluded from cost computation, I think there is something not clear with this feature.

I excluded from lost computation because I understand that the cost of this products going to be trashed are already taken in account on the inputs. If you trashed some output, you will need to add more inputs in order to produce the required product quantity. 

> Also probably it should not use lost_found but maybe a scrap/trash location.

For me there is no need to create a new type as if you want to separate the inventory losts from the production trashes two different locations can be used. If the user does not want to separate them, the same location can be used.
msg32528 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2017-03-15.23:14:57
When I saw that product going to lost_found are excluded from cost computation, I think there is something not clear with this feature.
Also probably it should not use lost_found but maybe a scrap/trash location.
New review33931002 at https://codereview.tryton.org/33931002/#ps1
msg32323 (view) Author: [hidden] (pokoli) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2017-03-07.16:18:11
Here is review33931002 which implements it
msg32317 (view) Author: [hidden] (ced) (Tryton committer) (Tryton translator) Date: 2017-03-07.13:41:34
I think it makes sense to allow to directly scrap some output of the production.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-07-07 13:45:54reviewbotsetmessages: + msg59039
2020-06-24 23:48:22reviewbotsetmessages: + msg58869
2020-06-07 13:14:25reviewbotsetmessages: + msg58589
2020-06-03 09:53:53cedsetmessages: + msg58435
2020-06-02 23:40:35cedsetmessages: + msg58429
2020-06-02 20:34:01edbosetnosy: + edbo
messages: + msg58425
2020-06-02 14:10:04reviewbotsetmessages: + msg58414
2020-06-02 13:57:23pokolisetreviews: 33931002 -> 323431002
2017-03-17 00:29:09cedsetmessages: + msg32562
2017-03-16 10:40:59pokolisetmessages: + msg32530
2017-03-15 23:14:57cedsetmessages: + msg32528
2017-03-07 16:38:12reviewbotsetnosy: + reviewbot
messages: + msg32326
2017-03-07 16:38:12reviewbotsetreviews: 33931002
keyword: + review
2017-03-07 16:18:11pokolisetstatus: unread -> testing
assignedto: pokoli
messages: + msg32323
2017-03-07 13:43:26pokolisetnosy: + pokoli
2017-03-07 13:41:34cedcreate