Issue 5834

Title
The party_siret module should use party.identifier
Priority
feature
Status
testing
Nosy list
ced, nicoe, reviewbot, risto3
Assigned to
ced
Keywords
easy, review

Created on 2016-08-26.10:39:34 by nicoe, last changed 1 week ago by reviewbot.

Messages

Author: [hidden] (ced) Tryton committer Tryton translator
Date: 2022-01-13.18:07:39

I revived this change by implementing the same design as the product supplier on party identifier with the address. This way review397071002 can store in the identifier the SIREN and SIRET.

Author: [hidden] (risto3)
Date: 2019-03-03.23:31:14
I guess as mentioned in https://discuss.tryton.org/t/party-identifiers-as-references/1210 that I believe it worthwhile to add a optional Many2One address field to PartyIdentifier allowing the identifier to be on the tuple party/address and not only on party.

This would allow, for one thing, stdnum's fr.siret to be used, not to mention any other physical address based party identifier (such as the French public school identifier).

The UI wouldn't be overly complex, on the contrary turns this into a powerful, extendable utility.
Author: [hidden] (nicoe) Tryton committer
Date: 2016-08-28.19:27:50
Author: [hidden] (nicoe) Tryton committer
Date: 2016-08-26.10:39:33
The party_siren module adds a siren field on the party. It should use the standard party.identifier way of doing thing.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-01-13 18:14:17reviewbotsetmessages: + msg73237
2022-01-13 18:07:39cedsetassignedto: nicoe -> ced
messages: + msg73236
nosy: + ced
reviews: 21241002 -> 397071002
2020-01-31 19:27:21reviewbotsetmessages: + msg55166
2019-03-03 23:31:14risto3setnosy: + risto3
messages: + msg47371
2016-09-16 23:27:30reviewbotsetnosy: + reviewbot
messages: + msg28823
2016-09-16 23:27:29reviewbotsetreviews: 21241002
keyword: + review
2016-08-28 19:27:51nicoesetstatus: unread -> testing
assignedto: nicoe
messages: + msg28159
2016-08-26 10:54:58pokolisetkeyword: + easy
2016-08-26 10:39:34nicoecreate

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)