Issue 4498

Title
Allow to browse history excluding the given datetime
Priority
feature
Status
in-progress
Nosy list
ced, jcavallo, nicoe, reviewbot
Assigned to
nicoe
Keywords
review

Created on 2015-01-19.16:51:18 by jcavallo, last changed 3 weeks ago by ced.

Messages

Author: [hidden] (ced) Tryton committer Tryton translator
Date: 2022-09-12.00:15:56

I think both reviews must be merged into a single to ease the process. Also we need an update of sao.

Author: [hidden] (ced) Tryton committer Tryton translator
Date: 2016-01-29.12:56:34
To align, you must use set_alignment.
Mark as in-progress as it still misses sao patch.
Author: [hidden] (ced) Tryton committer Tryton translator
Date: 2016-01-29.12:49:18
I think _datetime_included is better because if there is a before there should be also an after.
Author: [hidden] (jcavallo)
Date: 2016-01-29.12:37:34
For the client part, I do not know how to left align the label.
Author: [hidden] (jcavallo)
Date: 2016-01-29.12:35:26
Gtk client review

> I'm not sure about the name of the keyword "_datetime_exclude".

I replaced with _before_datetime
Author: [hidden] (jcavallo)
Date: 2015-02-02.12:27:26
> I'm not sure about the name of the keyword "_datetime_exclude".

What would you suggest ? The idea was to use the same approach
that is used for "_datetime", hence the name to mark the relation.

> Also this option should be available on the client side popup.

I am not confident enough to try myself at this. Maybe it could
be done later, once the server part is stable ?
Author: [hidden] (ced) Tryton committer Tryton translator
Date: 2015-01-29.11:46:47
I'm not sure about the name of the keyword "_datetime_exclude".
Also this option should be available on the client side popup.
Author: [hidden] (jcavallo)
Date: 2015-01-20.11:06:33
This is done by setting "_datetime_exclude" in the transaction's context. If this
is done, the checks against "_datetime" are now stricts, thus excluding the changes
that were made at "_datetime"
Author: [hidden] (jcavallo)
Date: 2015-01-19.16:51:17
Sometimes, it is useful to browse the history of a record "just before" a modification was made, like the functionality the changeset 86a2398a5c51 introduced for restoring.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-09-12 00:15:56cedsetassignedto: jcavallo -> nicoe
messages: + msg78029
nosy: + nicoe
type: feature request
2022-09-10 01:36:12reviewbotsetmessages: + msg77966
2022-07-13 18:23:57reviewbotsetmessages: + msg77314
2022-07-13 17:53:25reviewbotsetmessages: + msg77313
nosy: + reviewbot
2016-01-29 12:56:34cedsetstatus: testing -> in-progress
messages: + msg23978
2016-01-29 12:49:18cedsetmessages: + msg23977
2016-01-29 12:37:34jcavallosetmessages: + msg23976
2016-01-29 12:35:27jcavallosetreviews: 14901002 -> 14901002, 17021002
messages: + msg23975
2015-02-02 12:27:26jcavallosetmessages: + msg19970
2015-01-29 11:47:10cedsetcomponent: + tryton, trytond, sao

Showing 10 items. Show all history (warning: this could be VERY long)