Created on 2010-04-11.10:29:05 by timitos, last changed 6 months ago by roundup-bot.
New changeset c45876b1a824 by Cédric Krier in branch 'default': Make action window on singleton load the unique id https://hg.tryton.org/tryton-env/rev/c45876b1a824
New changeset 36ce819e336a by Cédric Krier in branch 'default': Make action window on singleton load the unique id https://hg.tryton.org/trytond/rev/36ce819e336a
Indeed using a wizard will not be a so good user experience because it will have an OK/Cancel buttons which is different from other form.
Instead we could have the action on singleton define the
res_id to be loaded by the client (instead of relying on new default values). Here is review361611003 which implements that.
I think we should replace all the Singleton menu entry by a wizard. I think it will provide a better experience as transient state which is closer to what happens with Singleton. Such wizard could a generic one define in singleton.py
i think this is really strange for the user as he did nothing.
This is not a bug but the normal behavior because singleton is created.
when i open the form 'Party Management -> Configuration -> Party Configuration' and close it without change again i am asked that the record has been modified and if i want to save it. But as i did not do anything this question should not happen
|2021-04-12 20:17:11||roundup-bot||set||messages: + msg66508|
nosy: + roundup-bot
status: testing -> resolved
|2021-04-10 21:16:13||reviewbot||set||messages: + msg66312|
nosy: + reviewbot
|2021-04-09 22:47:59||ced||set||assignedto: ced|
component: + trytond
keyword: + review
messages: + msg66249
status: chatting -> testing
superseder: + Reading singleton fails on _write and _delete pseudo fields
|2018-04-17 15:48:53||ced||link||issue1639 superseder|
|2018-04-17 15:48:14||ced||set||priority: wish -> feature|
messages: + msg40187
|2011-10-01 00:15:24||ced||set||title: strange behavior of view party configuration -> Singleton creation behavior|
|2011-08-22 19:50:40||ced||link||issue2133 superseder|
|2011-06-05 12:57:40||ced||link||issue1963 superseder|
|2010-04-11 10:55:33||timitos||set||messages: + msg6094|
|2010-04-11 10:49:28||ced||set||priority: bug -> wish|
status: unread -> chatting
messages: + msg6093
nosy: + ced